View Bug Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0002647 | DCP-o-matic | Bugs | public | 2023-11-07 15:25 | 2024-01-02 02:23 |
Reporter | Carsten | Assigned To | carl | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
Platform | Mac | OS | OS X | OS Version | 10.12 |
Product Version | 2.16.x | ||||
Target Version | 2.16.67 | ||||
Summary | 0002647: LEQ(m) calculation has bugs | ||||
Description | Looks as if LEQ(m) calculation has a bug in that the results vary with the number of audio channels. E.g. the same audio gives different results when e.g. 6 channels have been assigned in the DCP, vs, 8 or 16. As a result, you may get correct LEQ(m) values when you use a 5.1 source file in a 6ch DCP, but when you create a SMPTE DCP with 8 or 16channels in the mxf, the LEQ(m) will not calculate to the same number. That doesn't seem to happen with LUFS. I guess both LUFS and LEQ(m) should only use active channels, and there should also be a limitation to useful audio channels, that is, exclude HI/VI-N, ATMOS TC, dbox tracks, etc. That would mean, look only at channels 1-6, 11/12, and also take into account audio matrix. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Branch | 2647-leqm | ||||
Estimated weeks required | |||||
Estimated work required | Undecided | ||||
|
Carsten mentioned some problems with this. |
|
How is the channel assignment done for LUFS/R128 vs. LEQ(m)? |
|
Good question, it looks like LUFS/R128 only takes 5.1 and ignores anything else. |
|
Need to work out why Carsten gets failure to analyse audio with this branch (mentioned on the forum). |
|
Occasionally, I get that error message when trying to analyse audio. Usually it's fixed after deleting the analysis folder. I just set up a project to reproduce this new issue with 2.16.66devel: Create new project. Per default, number of DCP audio channels is set to 6. Add an audio MXF with 16 channels from a DCP previously generated with DCP-o-matic. In the matrix, only channel 1-6 are assigned, 7-16 remain unassigned. |
|
Thanks - this should be fixed now, I'll make another build. |
|
Hopefully all fixed in 4ae0193c125cc70176eb1660919d507fbf5378e4 |
|
Maybe related to 0001107 |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-07 15:25 | Carsten | New Bug | |
2023-11-07 15:25 | Carsten | Status | new => assigned |
2023-11-07 15:25 | Carsten | Assigned To | => carl |
2023-11-07 15:27 | Carsten | Description Updated | |
2023-11-07 15:27 | Carsten | Estimated work required | => Undecided |
2023-11-07 21:23 | carl | Target Version | 2.16.x => 2.16.67 |
2023-11-07 21:26 | carl | Relationship added | related to 0001991 |
2023-11-07 23:17 | carl | Status | assigned => confirmed |
2023-11-08 00:00 | carl | Branch | => 2647-leqm |
2023-11-08 00:00 | carl | Status | confirmed => tests running |
2023-11-11 00:24 | carl | Status | tests running => feedback |
2023-11-11 00:24 | carl | Note Added: 0006062 | |
2023-11-11 16:23 | Carsten | Note Added: 0006063 | |
2023-11-11 16:23 | Carsten | Status | feedback => assigned |
2023-11-11 18:57 | carl | Note Added: 0006065 | |
2023-11-15 13:31 | carl | Status | assigned => feedback |
2023-11-15 13:31 | carl | Note Added: 0006071 | |
2023-11-15 13:40 | Carsten | Note Added: 0006072 | |
2023-11-15 13:40 | Carsten | Status | feedback => assigned |
2023-11-15 16:50 | carl | Note Added: 0006073 | |
2023-11-19 23:03 | carl | Status | assigned => tests running |
2023-11-20 06:35 | carl | Status | tests running => resolved |
2023-11-20 06:35 | carl | Resolution | open => fixed |
2023-11-20 06:35 | carl | Note Added: 0006086 | |
2024-01-02 02:23 | mhm | Note Added: 0006180 |