Hi,
sometimes when I turn source files into DCPs for the cinema I work for, I get a source that sits in the middle between 2K and 4K resolution. Like right now, I've got a file with 2944x1106 resolution (short film in 2.66:1 aspect ratio) and now have to choose to make either 4K DCP and upscale or 2K DCP and lose resolution. I personally feel leery about upscaling, so in the past I've chosen 2K, but I thought to ask if there is some best practice or a recommendation based on how scaling in DoM actually works.
Thank in advance.
Better to upscale or downscale for nonstandard resolutions?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2025 1:56 pm
-
- Posts: 2905
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Better to upscale or downscale for nonstandard resolutions?
I wouldn't see a reason to prefer downscaling to upscaling. I think no one so far has performed a solid analysis of DCP-o-matic's scaling algorithm. Carl may comment on the actual method being used.
Would be interesting to compare upscaling of e.g. Davinci to DOMs own scaling.
That said, I never saw or heard about a weakness in DCP-o-matic's scaling. We use a 4k high contrast DCI projector that upscales 2k DCPs to 4k in realtime, and I never saw issues. We get a lot more 4k DCPs in recent years, by the way.
Also, the number of 4k projectors in the field is increasing. And especially wide screen formats beyond 2:1 definitely need the higher resolution because they discard so many pixels above and below the active pixel area.
Would be interesting to compare upscaling of e.g. Davinci to DOMs own scaling.
That said, I never saw or heard about a weakness in DCP-o-matic's scaling. We use a 4k high contrast DCI projector that upscales 2k DCPs to 4k in realtime, and I never saw issues. We get a lot more 4k DCPs in recent years, by the way.
Also, the number of 4k projectors in the field is increasing. And especially wide screen formats beyond 2:1 definitely need the higher resolution because they discard so many pixels above and below the active pixel area.