Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Anything and everything to do with DCP-o-matic.
Carsten
Posts: 2804
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by Carsten »

Yup, there is an issue. Barco ICMP is on 1.4.3.7.

I tried first with 2.14.57 on our cinema windows machine, with an encrypted SMPTE DCP. Ingest of both DCP and KDM, no issues, Barco properties dialog says: 'Valid, OK to play', and it does indeed play.

Then I tried it with 2.15.171, which I still have on my Mac. I created an encrypted SMPTE DCP and set all necessary metadata, basically, all language to DE. Barco ingested DCP and KDM fine, properties dialog says 'Valid, Ok to play' - but when I try to play, I get this error:

Bildschirmfoto 2022-02-03 um 04.50.18.png

As a first try, I can make both DCPs (2.14.57 and 2.15.171) available to you, they are small. Both do work in DCP-o-matic player 2.15.180 with local selfDKDMs, the one done with 2.15.171 get's no validator complaints. I can also try to generate a KDM towards our Sony and try it there. I may get a chance to access another ICMP on Monday which I can/will update to the most recent software version.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
StephW999
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:15 pm

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by StephW999 »

hi carl,
Maybe it's a problem with the version of openSSL which produces a wrong cipher value string, or because of a newer version of libxmlsec.
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2548
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by carl »

Great - that's the same error as the other reporter was seeing. If I can compare the good and bad DCPs that would be a good start. If there's nothing obvious from there we might have to go back through 2.15.x to work out where it was introduced.
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2548
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by carl »

carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2548
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by carl »

I guess if you have time it would also be interesting to try the latest test version just in case this is caused by the empty AnnotationText tags for some bizarre reason.

I could just about imagine the signer code discarding the empty tag before signing, or something.

The latest test is called 2.16.0 as I just got it all prepared for release on Monday :roll:
Carsten
Posts: 2804
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by Carsten »

I added dropbox links to the two DCPs on Mantis.

I COULD update the Barco to the very latest version, but I would not do it immediately. Nothing in the recent Barco version history says something that could be relevant to this problem. But very often 'smaller' bugs simply are not mentioned there and are cleaned out silently.

I am now creating another DCP with the most current test release, using the same project file and settings.
Carsten
Posts: 2804
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by Carsten »

Same problem with 2.16.0
Bildschirmfoto 2022-02-03 um 18.56.09.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Carsten
Posts: 2804
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by Carsten »

BTW - I tried to play all three (2.14.57/2.15.171/2.16.0) encrypted DCPs on our Sony - but when ingesting the KDMs, those created with 2.15.171 and 2.16.0 are rejected as invalid (no further details). I am quite sure I did everything right, but will try to recreate these DCPs and KDMs again later.

The encrypted DCP and KDM created with 2.14.57 ingest and play okay on both the Barco and the Sony.


Carl - I can't find the 'empty AnnotationText tags' bug on Mantis in the 'Resolved' bug list - do you have a link?
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2548
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by carl »

The other Sony bug is here.
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2548
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco

Post by carl »

BTW - I tried to play all three (2.14.57/2.15.171/2.16.0) encrypted DCPs on our Sony - but when ingesting the KDMs, those created with 2.15.171 and 2.16.0 are rejected as invalid (no further details). I am quite sure I did everything right, but will try to recreate these DCPs and KDMs again later.
Oh dear - maybe you're seeing the other mystery Sony bug. I'll look at your links as soon as I can and see if anything is obvious.